This is a special sort of stupid
Aug. 10th, 2009 01:01 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
From this editorial
"People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless."
"People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless."
no subject
Date: 2009-08-10 06:59 pm (UTC)was the stupidest thing I was going to read today. But no, you found the winner.
Rationing occurs in EVERY health care system, including the really f-ed up bureaucracy-ridden for-profit one we enjoy in the US. Funnily enough, our health outcomes (including longevity) aren't any better--and in some areas are worse--than countries with the dreaded socialized medicine.
While I come down firmly on the side of a Canadian-style single payer system, I'm certainly willing to concede that reasonable people can disagree about a lot of important issues regarding health-care reform. This article isn't making an argument at all, however. It's flat-out, slanderous lying in an attempt to fear-monger. Which makes me think the anti-reform folks don't think they have much of an argument.
Dying really isn't optional, since we don't know how to treat every disease or condition. At a certain point there really isn't anything more that can be done no matter HOW much money you or your health care system have. Otherwise we'd be swimming in ancient rich people. One of my partners is a palliative care doc and he participates in a lot of end-of-life and pre-hospice counseling. Palliative care and hospice and living wills aren't about pulling the plug on Grandma against her will to save the government some cash. They're about acknowledging the medical realities and giving Grandma the best possible--by her own standards and her own choices--months/weeks/days left to her.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-11 08:13 pm (UTC)As I understand it, the new system would make government resources available to elderly folks who want some help or guidance about end-of-life decisions like living wills and that sort of stuff. Considering how complicated some of that can be, that's either a really nice benefit, or it's a nightmare (when was the last time someone from the government actually made something simpler or easier to understand?)
That said, my impression is not that the government will go hunting down old people and making them write power of attorney documents; but rather will communicate that help is available to those who need it (I'd imagine this would involve sending them a brochure or something.)
no subject
Date: 2009-08-10 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-10 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-10 07:18 pm (UTC)Score an own-goal for professional journalism! Whhoooooo!
no subject
Date: 2009-08-10 07:46 pm (UTC)Never mind.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-10 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-12 06:06 pm (UTC)Ummm, Johnny ...
Date: 2009-08-12 06:32 pm (UTC)Re: Ummm, Johnny ...
Date: 2009-08-12 06:44 pm (UTC)Sorry my brain has melted in anger at some of the insanities of the present debate.
Evidently I'm losing it badly. Apologies to all concerned.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-10 07:53 pm (UTC)It's like a nut-shot, but to my brain.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-10 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-11 04:32 pm (UTC)Just to emphasize the point: what planet are these chaps on? Almost tempted to gank it for my page, but I'm still catching up.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-11 08:18 pm (UTC)I don't think "end-of-life planning" means the same thing on my planet as it does on this guy's.