Date: 2008-12-04 04:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jcw-da-dmg.livejournal.com
I answered Bilbo because I was actually able to wade my way through that book.

Date: 2008-12-04 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] born-to-me.livejournal.com
I barely made it through The Hobbit while praying to die... then, masochist that I am, I started the first LOTR books. YIKES! I quit quickly.

I did like the movies, I might someday try to read the books again. MIGHT.

Date: 2008-12-04 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jerusha.livejournal.com
I had bounced off the books before watching the movies, too. Once I'd seen the first movie, the characters were people to me, and I cared what happened. Before that, not so much.

Date: 2008-12-04 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] born-to-me.livejournal.com
I think there's truth in that for me, too. Tolkien was... um... *cough* tedious. Now that I have a grasp of the stories and the characters I think I could go back and read them, and enjoy the detail much more.

Date: 2008-12-04 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jcw-da-dmg.livejournal.com
I had MANY friends at the time who were heavily into them, so I thought I would give them a shot even thought they didn't sound very interesting to me. My brother MADE me watch the first two movies (the first one in Spanish with English subtitles!) and they were OK, and the next year he dragged me to the third. This is my OLDER brother, BTW (they're all older).

My problem with the books is that there's just too much stuff in them that has nothing to do with moving the plot along. TH was less guilty of this than the others were.

Profile

ericcoleman: (Default)
ericcoleman

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 09:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios