Date: 2008-05-01 02:11 pm (UTC)
ext_2963: (Default)
From: [identity profile] alymid.livejournal.com
I got pissed off at Jones a few weeks ago - I try to avoid all soda that has HFCS in it. And I had been buying Jones, because it advertises Real Cane Sugar on its boxes. I happened to run my eye over the ingredients label and it said "inverted cane sugar". Having no idea what that was I looked it up - they basically take Cane sugar, and muck with its chemical composition and turn it into something just like HFCS.

*sigh* - Now I am looking for Boylans, and Izzie wherever I can find them.

Date: 2008-05-01 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bibliofile.livejournal.com
Given the options of Barqs or Sprecher, well, they both contain HFCS so I'll support Sprecher instead.

re: Jones
That's what I get for reading ingredients but not doing research into the unfamiliar ones.

Date: 2008-05-01 02:59 pm (UTC)
ext_2963: (Default)
From: [identity profile] alymid.livejournal.com
I have to admit that the preference was from way back when I was drinking soda regularly and not paying attention to HFCS. I just liked the Sprecher better. Now I probably wouldn't drink either.

Date: 2008-05-01 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tigertoy.livejournal.com
That's a real let down; I would have thought Sprecher's was real enough to have sugar.

Don't need those calories anyway.

Date: 2008-05-01 06:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jcw-da-dmg.livejournal.com
It wouldn't surprise me if they announced that HFCS is people!

Profile

ericcoleman: (Default)
ericcoleman

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 22nd, 2025 03:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios