ericcoleman: (Default)
[personal profile] ericcoleman
Since there seems to be a little doubt now, I thought I would ask my friends. What do you think of this ???

[Poll #794652]

Date: 2006-08-14 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pheret1.livejournal.com
I don't know. I'm so confused.

This is shaking the foundations of my warm-cozy-things-I've-known-since-grade-school-and-done-reports-on basics. Yes. No. Yes.

*need more coffee before answering the poll, perhaps*

Date: 2006-08-14 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devospice.livejournal.com
I always felt that since Pluto orbits on a different plane than the rest of the planets it probably didn't form with them when the solar system was formed, but was probably captured in orbit as it passed by, or was a moon that was knocked away or something. So it shouldn't be a planet, by definition.

I don't think size should be an issue. It should be when/how it was formed and its resulting orbit (since they're all on the same plane). Although then each asteroid in the asteroid belt could be a separate planet, so who knows?

Date: 2006-08-14 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bammba-m.livejournal.com
i don't think that, "because that's how i learned it" isn't a good enough reason for science to deny new discoveries.

if they want to set up arbitrary rules and let those be the guidelines for how they label celestial bodies, then that's great. but let's not just set up arbitrary guidelines and then arbitrarily not follow them. that's just silly. scientists are allowed to be silly, but they can't set up 6th grade science students for failure because they don't want to come to a consensus. that's rude.

Date: 2006-08-14 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bammba-m.livejournal.com
ARG!!! i corrected myself wrong!! i meant that the argument, "because that's how i learned it" is NOT a good one.

Date: 2006-08-14 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mplsfish.livejournal.com
Osce made me say yes. The truth is I don't care.
I would have answerend the third one.

Date: 2006-08-14 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pheltzer.livejournal.com
Wait a minute... I thought Pluto was an Ancient Greek Philospher...

Date: 2006-08-15 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blur01.livejournal.com
No No, thats a smallish network system developed at the U of I.

Date: 2006-08-15 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blur01.livejournal.com
I dont think "because thats how I learned it" is a good enough arguement either (They renamed the brontosaur to Diplodicus(sp) so, damn).

But, yes, it has a strange orbit but it also has 3 other orbiting bodies around it.

I will admit that if they continue to hype it, they might manage to get more children interested in the sciences which all in all is a good thing in my opinion.

Date: 2006-08-16 02:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peteralway.livejournal.com
My Very Educated Mother Just Showed Us Nine Planets. Demote Pluto, and it's "My Very Educated Mother Just Showed Us Eight." YOu have to rename Neptune "Eptune."

Bad move.

Some say Pluto isn't a planet, it's a Kuiper Belt "object." So Pluto is a different sort of planet--that's OK. We already have Terrestrial Planets and Jovian Planets. There is room in the Solar System for "Kuiper Belt Planets.

And so what if they are discovering new Kuiper Belt Objects bigger than Pluto? There's room in the solar system for more planets. This is the freaking 21st century! If they can't discover more planets in the 21st century, what's the point of living in the future!

Profile

ericcoleman: (Default)
ericcoleman

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 345 67
891011121314
151617 18192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 09:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios