Those movies
Jul. 12th, 2008 10:31 am1. Titanic (1997) $600,779,824
2. Star Wars (1977) $460,935,665
3. Shrek 2 (2004) $436,471,036
4. E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) $434,949,459
5. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) $431,065,444
6. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006) $423,032,628
7. Spider-Man (2002) $403,706,375
8. Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005) $380,262,555
9. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) $377,019,252
10. Spider-Man 2 (2004) $373,377,893
11. The Passion of the Christ (2004) $370,270,943
12. Jurassic Park (1993) $356,784,000
13. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) $340,478,898
14. Finding Nemo (2003) $339,714,367
15. Spider-Man 3 (2007) $336,530,303
16. Forrest Gump (1994) $329,691,196
17. The Lion King (1994) $328,423,001
18. Shrek the Third (2007) $320,706,665
19. Transformers (2007) $318,759,914
20. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's/Philosopher's Stone (2001) $317,557,891
21. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) $313,837,577
22. Iron Man (2008) $311,708,133
23. Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) $310,675,583
24. Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (2007) $309,404,152
25. Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi (1983) $309,125,40
I don't really remember which I saw in the theater, but it was most of them.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 05:43 pm (UTC)That's a lot of movies...wonder (other than Iron Man) if any of this year's films will knock any of those off the top 25 list.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 08:07 pm (UTC)Titanic isn't about the boat sinking. The disaster is just the background for a much more intimate story. I had my doubts when I saw it, but I did see it, and I don't regret it.
I wonder how high Iron Man will be on the list after a couple of years of DVD sales. Heck, it's probably still playing in some theatres.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 09:19 pm (UTC)By that logic you don't need to see any Christ movie, either.
Agreed with what [Unknown site tag] says. Plus, Winslet!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-12 09:38 pm (UTC)I know some folks will be shocked about my not having seen #18, since the first one in that series is currently my favorite movie...
Although I did see WALL-E today, and I really liked that one, too.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 04:15 am (UTC)Don't get me wrong, I actually liked Titanic - but only because the disaster sequences look so amazing. And, I respect how much homework the producers did to make sure the events were historically accurate. If the events themselves don't interest you, take a pass.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 04:18 am (UTC)It WOULD be interesting to see how kind inflation has been to "Gone With The Wind" or "Snow White And The Seven Dwarves" - but alas, nobody was really counting at the time. Both those films HAVE grossed hundreds of millions, but only through reissues.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 05:30 am (UTC)Wasn't inclined/interested by anything about Titanic when it appeared in theatres; am still not interested. I like boy-meets-girl stories...just not that one. Like Winslet, detest DiCaprio, although I like his enviroethics, but I can live without him as an actor. *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 05:40 am (UTC)James Caviezel should have gotten awards for physical stamina; he was struck by lightning, came down with pneumonia (I think) and dislocated his shoulder (if I remember correctly). He also was struck once by the cat-o-nine-tails when they missed the board strapped to his back during the whipping scene. Brutal.
Other than that...you're not missing much having skipped it. Of course I went to see it with two severely conservative religious people, and I am a bit more liberally minded than either of the people I went with...neither of whom is still in my circle of acquaintances. Fairly certain that for one of them my reaction to the movie was part of why. I don't miss him.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 06:49 am (UTC)Fair enough, I guess. I still gotta give the nod to Titanic because you don't have to merely BELIEVE a ship really sank.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-13 03:57 pm (UTC)