Of course if my readings have been correct... the whole article is something of a farse anyway... since it appears that congressmen don't actually swear on any book, Bible, Koran, Dianetics, whatever. They just raise their hand and give an oath. So looks like Prager is just stirring up controversy for controversy sake. Either that or he's completely ignorant on the subject he's writting about. Which wouldn't surprise me.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-12-04 05:18 pm (UTC)