ericcoleman (
ericcoleman) wrote2008-10-15 10:51 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
I've been staying out of this
At least in my own journal. But some things need comment
This was on the Sacramento county GOP website.

There is an article here
The important quote is from chairman of the Sacramento County Republican party, Craig MacGlashan. “Some people find it offensive, others do not. I cannot comment on how people interpret things.”
This was on the Sacramento county GOP website.
There is an article here
The important quote is from chairman of the Sacramento County Republican party, Craig MacGlashan. “Some people find it offensive, others do not. I cannot comment on how people interpret things.”
no subject
That's why you get Obama saying things like McCain is "losing his bearings" or the campaign ad that pointed out that McCain doesn't know how to use e-mail. Of course, in that case, it's because his injuries from his Vietnam captivity make it painful to type for any period of time, so his staff and family handle e-mail for him.
Here's Harry Reid saying McCain is "dangerous". Or Ohio Governor Ted Strickland saying McCain is "not as stable mentally" as GWB. (Strickland said he didn't mean what he actually said.)
See, the Democrats don't have to stir up hate. They can go with pity for this poor old senile Senator...
no subject
As for the "losing bearings" thing. I could see arguments either way. His campaign is all over the place though. And he did refer to a crowd just this last week as "my fellow prisoners".
So, which one has a basis in truth?
Obama- Arab, terrorist, Muslim?
McCain - Bad temper, running a disorganized campaign, old?
no subject
Obama - radical
McCain - racist
Which one has a basis in truth?
no subject
no subject
As far as McCain's bad temper, I've got a problem with that. I have a bigger problem with Obama's policies.
I presume you've heard that he supports "card check", which means eliminating the secret ballot in union representation elections. That's far enough left that even George McGovern thinks it's wrong.
If you've managed to get to the left of McGovern, I submit that radical might be a good word for it. :)