ericcoleman: (Important Question Of The Day)
ericcoleman ([personal profile] ericcoleman) wrote2008-06-19 11:16 am

The Most Important Question Of The Day

[Poll #1207457]

Today brought to you by the letter 3 and [livejournal.com profile] jcw_da_dmg

[identity profile] bdunbar.livejournal.com 2008-06-19 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Paper - doesn't slide around in the trunk like plastic bags do. The bag just sit there nice and perky and (if properly sacked) stuff won't spill out. You can carry more, per bag.

Plastic bags - feh. The handles turn into flesh-slicing threads, set them down and everything sort of slops out. They'll slide all over the trunk, tossing your goods hither and yon.

I'm not convinced that paper bags are, really, that harmful to the environment. Trees are a _crop_ - how much of our paper comes from old growth forests and how much from managed tree farms?

It's also possible that this is my background speaking - my dad's side of the family makes (or made) their living in and around paper mills, forestry and lumber jacking. Yep - they're the people that laughed at the tree huggers and ate spotted owls for lunch.

[identity profile] archiver-tim.livejournal.com 2008-06-19 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I would think that almost all paper pulp comes from tree farms or by products of gathering lumber.

[identity profile] theaspins.livejournal.com 2008-06-19 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know about paper bags, but Kleenex still comes from old-growth forests.

[identity profile] bdunbar.livejournal.com 2008-06-19 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think so. I looked around but all I can see supporting that is .. Greenpeace propaganda.

Which doesn't mean they're wrong, but .. Greenpeace is hardly a non-biased source.

[identity profile] catsittingstill.livejournal.com 2008-06-20 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't understand why Greenpeace would mind paper that is genuinely sustainably harvested. So I don't see what they have to gain by lying and saying that it isn't.