Chaplin was a completely reprehensible human being. One of the true scum of the earth.
Watch The General alone, then watch The General with an audience. Then you can really appreciate what a great work of art it is. And realize that Keaton was a modern film maker, about 40 years ahead of his time. Chaplin was a manipulative ephebophilic creep. He used a truly creep mawkish sentimentality, combined with a true meanness, to sucker people into thinking he was a genius.
"ephebophilic" was not a word I was initmately familiar with in my upbringing, but it wasn't hard to draw inferences from context and word structure. Nevertheless, I don't accept that as good enough when I'm already sitting at the edge of the internet, font of all knowledge accessible to mere mortals.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Chaplin was a completely reprehensible human being. One of the true scum of the earth.
Watch The General alone, then watch The General with an audience. Then you can really appreciate what a great work of art it is. And realize that Keaton was a modern film maker, about 40 years ahead of his time. Chaplin was a manipulative ephebophilic creep. He used a truly creep mawkish sentimentality, combined with a true meanness, to sucker people into thinking he was a genius.
no subject
no subject
Keaton: The true genius of the silent age
Chaplin: The vicious little Ephebophil
no subject
no subject
I SURE wanted to though.
no subject
so i looked it up.
webster said it wasn't a word.
i just found that kinda amusing.
no subject